year 12, Issue 32 (12-2022)                   mmi 2022, 12(32): 71-90 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

mayahi M, MIRRIAHI S, Mazhari M E, Mehralizadeh Y. Influential Factors Affecting the Arbitration of the Final Designs by Students majoring in Architecture. mmi 2022; 12 (32) : 5
1- Department of Architecture, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran/ Associate Professor, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Architecture, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran/ Assistant Professor, School of Engineering, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran
4- Department of Educational Sciences, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran/PHD, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract:   (1130 Views)
Evaluation of architectural designs involves judging the design. In this way, it measures the amount of variables in the design from the desired aspect and then judges it. Due to the important role of arbitration in courses having architectural projects, if the type of arbitration is not clear, it will affect the appropriate atmosphere on arbitration, will cause unrelated demands related to educational goals and will destroy the development of students’ talents. The purpose of this study is to achieve the criteria and indicators of realistic judgment in the field of knowledge and professional ability of students majoring in architecture in Iran. The purpose of the present study is an attempt to answer the question of what are the factors that indicate the evaluation criteria and judgement of architectural projects in prominent universities in the field of architecture in Iran? And what is the viewpoint of the professors in this regard? The research method was mixed (quantitative-qualitative) and in terms of practical purpose Statistical population were 17  famous academic instructors of Architecture at Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Science and Technology and Shahid Chamran Ahvaz universities. In order to achieve more accurate results, it was preferred to take the opinions of young and novice professors in the field of judging architectural designs, along with the opinions of experts. Accordingly, 25 young professors who were completing their doctoral studies at Shahid Beheshti University, University of Tehran, Tehran Azad University and University of Science and Technology and had a history of teaching in architectural design workshops at the university as a statistical population. were chosen. Which were selected according to the educational fields, due to the importance of scoring and its direct impact on the research results, sampling was done in a systematic and non-random was applied. Based on the studies, a model was developed to evaluate the architectural plans, then the professors were first interviewed, the validity of the evaluation model was assessed, and then a questionnaire of the Likert type, one question was selected for them in a contractual manner to determine the level of specificity for the specified criteria. Then, two questions were interviewed as open questionnaires, and finally, after the interview, the initial model was edited and the final model was obtained. Results and information were analyzed using SPSS software. This study showed that the final criteria for evaluating the design process are divided into two sub-branches of studies and design. The studies are divided into two sub-groups of basic knowledge and attention to technical studies. According to experts, studies and technical knowledge have the greatest impact on the final product. From the young professors point of view, advancement of the design process has the greatest impact on professors’ scoring, followed by the design skills and studies and technical knowledge. Finally, suggestions and solutions were presented to the jury, architecture educators and specialists to improve the quality of the judges’ level of arbitration.  
Article number: 5
Full-Text [PDF 1032 kb]   (157 Downloads)    

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Conservation and Architecture in Iran

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb