1- Isfahan Azad University
2- elm va sanat , hamzenejad@iust.ac.ir
3- isfahan honar
4- najaf abad university
2- elm va sanat , hamzenejad@iust.ac.ir
3- isfahan honar
4- najaf abad university
Abstract: (519 Views)
If architecture students rely on the form of the work more than anything in the process of reading and understanding architectural examples, then consequences such as neglecting the historical-identity values, meaning and meaning of the works will follow. Therefore, the most important question of this research is how much the students pay attention to each aspect of the work-audience relationship in the process of criticizing and encountering the work? The upcoming research aims to measure the amount of attention and use of communication aspects from field and library studies in both qualitative and quantitative ways, as described first, the place and importance of exposure and criticism in students' understanding and reception was investigated. Furthermore, the communication aspects of the work-audience were deduced by the comparative method and the content analysis method from the matching of two phenomenological and interpretive approaches, and in order to evaluate the degree of application of these aspects in relation to the case example of the Sheikh Lotfollah Mosque in Isfahan University of Arts and Azad University. Islami Khorasgan, statistical tools such as questionnaire and spss software were used. According to the results of the test and the calculated confidence interval, it can be said that the facet of awakening memories and the representational facet of the effect have a higher average than the average, and in the meantime, the representational facet has a higher average effect than the other aspects, which means that the facet The demonstration of a work has had a greater impact, and if the necessary measures are not taken to pay attention to it in the process of criticizing architectural works as well as in the design process, its threatening educational and training role on the process of criticizing architecture students becomes more obvious. Also, the cognitive value facet and the historical originalist facet have an average lower than the average, and according to the average values and confidence intervals of each, it can be said that the value facet has a lower average than the other faces, and it means that the value cognitive facet has less influence than the others. The focus is on the understanding of the achievements of the work, and the reasons for it have been reported by the university professors, the neglect of the meaning and content of the work, along with the tendency towards specific styles and methods in architecture.
Article number: 117
Type of Study: Research original/ Regular Article |
Subject:
معماري و شهرسازي
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
